Aceh—
Internal
Controls and Accountability Prove Key to Better Financial Reporting in Aceh
Government. The research
conducted by T Muhammad Deri, Darwanis, and Mulia Saputra from Universitas
Syiah Kuala, Aceh, published in January 2026 in the International
Journal of Management Analytics (IJMA).
The
research conducted by T Muhammad Deri, Darwanis, and Mulia Saputra
showed that the quality of the Aceh government’s financial statements is
strongly influenced by the internal control system, government accounting
policies, and regional financial management accountability.
This study is important because over the past several years Aceh has successfully obtained an Unqualified Opinion (WTP) from the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK). However, the researchers emphasized that receiving a WTP opinion does not mean that all problems have been resolved. In practice, there are still specific notes indicating weaknesses, such as issues in regional asset management and financial governance that has not yet been fully well-organized.
Unqualified
Opinions Do Not Automatically Mean “Perfect” Financial Governance
Aceh
recorded six consecutive Unqualified Opinions between 2015 and 2020. Before
that, the province still received a Qualified Opinion. While the achievement is
positive, Deri and his colleagues highlight that the financial reporting
process still contains weaknesses, especially in areas like:
- regional
asset recording,
- the
management of public property,
- and
administrative completeness in reporting.
In
other words, a clean audit opinion does not always reflect the full complexity
of public financial management.
This
is why the authors explored which factors actually shape the quality of Aceh’s
financial statements.
Four
Key Factors Behind Financial Reporting Quality
The
study tested the influence of four major variables:
- Internal
Control System (SPI)
- Government
Accounting Policies (KAP)
- Human
Resource Competence (KSDM)
- Regional
Financial Management Accountability (APKD)
These
factors were selected because they represent the core pillars of public-sector
financial reporting: strong procedures, standardized accounting rules, capable
personnel, and transparent accountability mechanisms.
Research
Method: Survey Across 47 Government Work Units
The
researchers used a quantitative causal-associative approach to test how
the four variables relate to financial reporting quality.
The
study population consisted of 47 Aceh Government Work Units (SKPA). Data
were collected using structured questionnaires and analyzed with multiple
linear regression using SPSS.
The
regression model used in the paper was:
KLK
= a + β1SPI + β2KSDM + β3KAP + β4APKD + e
Where
KLK refers to financial reporting quality, while SPI, KSDM, KAP, and APKD
represent the independent variables.
Main
Results: The Four Variables Matter Together
The
statistical results show that internal controls, accounting policies, HR
competence, and accountability simultaneously influence financial reporting
quality in Aceh.
The
study reported an R Square value of 0.505, meaning:
Around
50.5% of financial reporting quality can be explained by the four tested
variables.
The
remaining 49.5% is influenced by other factors not included in the study, such
as organizational culture, IT systems, leadership, or political and
institutional pressures.
This
result reinforces the idea that financial reporting quality is not shaped by a
single element, but by multiple interacting systems.
Internal
Control System Shows the Strongest Contribution
Among
the tested variables, the Internal Control System (SPI) emerged as the
most consistent driver of financial reporting quality.
The
regression coefficient for SPI was:
- SPI
= 0.346
The
authors explain that internal controls function as the backbone of public
financial governance. A strong internal control system ensures:
- clear
separation of duties,
- structured
authorization processes,
- accurate
recording of transactions,
- reduced
risk of fraud and manipulation,
- and
compliance with regulations.
In Indonesia, internal controls in government institutions are guided by frameworks such as Government Regulation No. 60 of 2008, which outlines the Government Internal Control System.
Government
Accounting Policies Strengthen Reporting Consistency
Government
Accounting Policies (KAP) also showed a positive influence, with a coefficient
of:
- KAP
= 0.158
Accounting
policies are crucial because they guide how financial transactions are
recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in government financial
statements.
These
policies are rooted in national regulations such as:
- Government
Regulation No. 71 of 2010
on Government Accounting Standards (SAP).
The
authors note that consistent application of SAP-based accounting policies
improves the financial reports’:
- relevance,
- comparability,
- transparency,
- and
reliability.
Human
Resource Competence Matters, but Not as Strongly as Expected
Human
Resource Competence (KSDM) produced a coefficient of:
- KSDM
= 0.259
While
HR competence was shown to influence reporting quality, its impact was not as
dominant as internal controls.
The
authors suggest one reason: financial reporting processes in local government
are increasingly supported by standardized government financial systems and
software. This reduces the degree to which reporting quality depends solely on
individual capability.
However,
the researchers still emphasize that without proper competence—especially in
accounting standards and reporting procedures—errors can still occur, such as:
- incorrect
journal entries,
- incomplete
reporting,
- and misclassification of transactions.
Accountability
Also Improves Financial Reporting Quality
The
fourth variable, Regional Financial Management Accountability (APKD),
also contributed positively, with a coefficient of:
- APKD
= 0.116
Accountability
refers to the government’s obligation to manage and report public funds
responsibly, transparently, and in line with legal and ethical standards.
The
authors argue that stronger accountability leads to better reporting because
government units become more disciplined in:
- documenting
financial activities,
- preparing
supporting evidence,
- ensuring
compliance,
- and
responding to audits.
Accountability
also strengthens public trust, since financial reports are one of the main
instruments citizens use to evaluate whether public budgets are managed
properly.
Practical
Implications: Aceh Should Strengthen Systems, Not Just Chase Audit Opinions
The
study delivers a clear practical message for local governments:
Achieving
WTP should not be the final goal. Strengthening internal systems should be the
priority.
The
authors emphasize that Aceh—and other regional governments—can improve
reporting quality by focusing on:
- internal
control strengthening,
- consistent
accounting policy implementation,
- continuous
HR training,
- and
building a culture of accountability.
If
these four areas improve simultaneously, financial reporting quality will
become more sustainable and resilient.
Researchers
Recommend Regular Training and Stronger Supervision
In
their recommendations, Deri, Darwanis, and Saputra highlight several practical
steps, including:
- periodic
training for financial staff,
- routine
evaluation of accounting and reporting systems,
- stronger
SOP enforcement,
- more
active internal audits,
- and
deeper SAP-based accounting education for report preparers.
Author
Profiles
- T Muhammad Deri
- Universitas Syiah Kuala
- Darwanis
- Universitas Syiah Kuala
- Mulia Saputra -Universitas Syiah Kuala.
Research Source
Deri, Darwanis, Mulia Saputra “The
Influence of Internal Control Systems, Government Accounting Policies, Human
Resource Competence and Regional Financial Management Accountability on the
Quality of Financial Reporting” International Journal of Management Analytics (IJMA), Vol. 4 No. 1
(Januari 2026), halaman 131–146.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.59890/ijma.v4i1.290
URL: https://dmimultitechpublisher.my.id/index.php/ijma
.png)
0 Komentar