Jakarta— Good Governance and Transformational
Leadership Boost Performance at Indonesia’s Anti-Corruption Agency. The research conducted by Galih
Gandara, Mohamad Rizan, and Indra Pahala, and published in January 2026 in the
journal International Journal of Integrated Science and Technology.
The research conducted by Galih
Gandara, Mohamad Rizan, and Indra Pahala found that the implementation of good
governance and transformational leadership plays a major role in improving the
performance of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK).
This research reveals that public organizations will work more effectively when led by visionary leaders, have a strong work culture, and apply transparent and accountable governance principles. Amid the challenges of low public trust in state institutions, these findings provide a new direction for bureaucratic reform.
Corruption,
Public Trust, and Institutional Performance
Corruption
remains a major challenge in Indonesia. According to Transparency
International, Indonesia ranked 114th out of 180 countries in the 2023
Corruption Perceptions Index, with a score of 34 out of 100. This ranking
highlights persistent governance problems and declining public confidence.
As
the country’s main anti-corruption body, the Corruption Eradication Commission
(KPK) carries a heavy responsibility. Its performance directly affects public
trust, legal certainty, and political stability. For this reason, internal
management systems, leadership quality, and governance practices are crucial.
Many
experts argue that organizational success in the public sector depends on
leadership style, institutional culture, governance standards, and employee
commitment. However, until now, limited research has examined how these factors
interact within Indonesia’s anti-corruption agency.
This
study fills that gap by analyzing how leadership, culture, and governance
influence performance, and whether organizational commitment plays a mediating
role.
Method:
Surveying 300 KPK Employees
The
researchers applied a quantitative approach using a structured survey. They
collected data from 300 permanent employees of the Corruption Eradication
Commission.
Participants
responded to questionnaires using a five-point scale, ranging from “strongly
disagree” to “strongly agree.” The survey measured:
- Transformational
leadership
- Organizational
culture
- Good
governance practices
- Organizational
commitment
- Organizational
performance
To
assess performance, the researchers used the Balanced Scorecard approach, which
evaluates organizations from four perspectives: stakeholders, customers,
internal processes, and learning and growth.
The
data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with LISREL
software. This method allowed the researchers to examine both direct and
indirect relationships between variables.
After
refining the model, the statistical results showed strong reliability and
validity, confirming that the findings were robust and consistent.
Key
Findings: Governance Comes First
The
analysis produced four main findings.
1.
Transformational Leadership Improves Performance
Leaders
who motivate, inspire, and encourage innovation have a positive impact on
organizational results. The study found that transformational leadership
significantly increased organizational performance.
In
practical terms, this means leaders who communicate a clear vision, support
staff development, and promote ethical behavior help institutions work more
effectively.
2.
Organizational Culture Matters
Organizational
culture also plays an important role. Agencies that emphasize professionalism,
teamwork, integrity, and results tend to perform better.
A
healthy culture guides employee behavior, strengthens cooperation, and aligns
daily activities with institutional goals.
3.
Good Governance Has the Strongest Impact
Among
all variables, good governance had the greatest influence on performance.
The
study shows that transparency, accountability, openness, and respect for the
rule of law are the most powerful drivers of organizational success in the
public sector.
Each
improvement in governance practices significantly boosted institutional
performance. This confirms that strong systems and clear procedures are more
important than informal arrangements.
4.
Organizational Commitment Is Not Decisive
Surprisingly,
organizational commitment did not significantly affect performance. Employees’
emotional attachment, loyalty, and sense of belonging were not strong
predictors of organizational results.
Moreover,
commitment did not mediate the relationship between leadership, culture,
governance, and performance.
This means that even highly committed employees cannot compensate for weak systems, poor leadership, or weak governance.
What
Do These Results Mean?
The
findings challenge a common assumption in management: that loyal and committed
employees are the main drivers of performance. In highly regulated public
institutions like the KPK, structural and managerial systems matter more.
According
to the researchers, organizational performance in law enforcement agencies
depends primarily on:
- Clear
governance rules
- Transparent
decision-making
- Strong
leadership vision
- Consistent
institutional culture
Individual
motivation alone is not enough if the system does not support professionalism
and accountability.
The
authors emphasize that “managerial systems and governance mechanisms play a
greater role than psychological attachment in shaping performance.”
Implications
for Public Sector Reform
This
study offers important lessons for policymakers, government leaders, and public
administrators.
For
Government Institutions
Public
agencies should prioritize strengthening governance systems. This includes:
- Improving
transparency in budgeting and procurement
- Ensuring
accountability in decision-making
- Strengthening
internal controls
- Enforcing
ethical standards
These
measures directly improve performance and public trust.
For
Organizational Leaders
Leaders
should develop transformational leadership skills through:
- Coaching
and mentoring programs
- Leadership
training
- Performance
evaluations focused on ethical conduct and innovation
Leaders
who inspire and empower employees create more resilient institutions.
For
Human Resource Management
Although
commitment was not a key factor, employee engagement remains important.
However, it must be combined with strong leadership and governance reforms.
Training
programs should focus not only on motivation, but also on professionalism,
compliance, and institutional values.
Researchers’
Perspective
The
authors argue that public organizations need direct-effect management models
rather than mediation-based models.
In
other words, leadership, culture, and governance must directly shape
performance. Relying on employee loyalty as an intermediary strategy is
ineffective in highly accountable institutions.
They
also stress that anti-corruption agencies require stricter systems than
ordinary organizations, because their work involves high legal and political
risks.
Author
Profiles
- Galih
Gandara, S.E., M.M : Universitas
Negeri Jakarta.
- Mohamad
Rizan, S.E., M.Si., Ph.D.
: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
- Indra
Pahala, S.E., M.M. : Universitas
Negeri Jakarta.
Research
Source
Galih,
Rizan, Indra. The Effect of Transformational Leadership,
Organizational Culture, and Good Governance Principles on Organizational
Performance with Organizational Commitment as a Mediating Variable
International Journal of
Integrated Science and Technology (IJIST)Volume 4, Nomor 1, 2026, Halaman
34–49
DOI:https://doi.org/10.59890/ijist.v4i1.261 URL: https://ntlmultitechpublisher.my.id/index.php/ijist
.png)
0 Komentar