A lack of confidence in one's own analytical abilities is a major factor shaping the financial decisions of young investors
Background: The Young Investor Boom and Psychological Traps
Digital transformation and the widespread accessibility of financial technology (fintech) applications have reshaped how Indonesians view financial management
Despite growing access and financial knowledge, real-world investor behavior often deviates from rational decision-making
Methodology: Measuring Campus Investor Hesitation
The study utilized a quantitative approach to examine the cause-and-effect relationship between psychological self-doubt and investment time horizons
Primary data was collected through an online questionnaire using a five-point Likert scale and evaluated using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS 4 software
Key Findings: Diverging Paths in Investment Strategies
The data analysis revealed that underconfidence bias has a statistically significant yet opposing effect depending on the chosen investment horizon
- Driving Short-Term Investments (Significant Positive Effect): Self-doubt has a significant positive influence on short-term investment decisions ($\beta = 0.482$; $p < 0.001$)
. Students who feel uncertain about their analytical capabilities are actually more inclined to engage in short-term investment strategies . This indicates that hesitation drives young investors toward highly liquid assets or quick-turnaround trades, even though short-term instruments are often prone to high price volatility and market risks . - Hindering Long-Term Investments (Significant Negative Effect): Conversely, underconfidence bias exerts a significant negative effect on long-term investment decisions ($\beta = -0.167$; $p = 0.002$)
. Low self-confidence discourages students from committing their funds to assets with horizons exceeding one year . Concerns over future uncertainties lead them to delay or avoid long-term investments, despite these instruments offering greater stability and superior wealth-accumulation potential through compounding returns . - Psychological Dominance in Short-Term Choices: Statistical models show that underconfidence bias accounts for 23.2% of the variance in students' short-term investment decisions
. Meanwhile, it explains only 2.8% of the variance in long-term decisions, proving that long-term commitments are far more complex and heavily influenced by external factors such as financial goals, risk tolerance, and personal income .
Impact and Implications for Education and Society
These research findings carry vital implications for higher education institutions, financial market practitioners, and public policymakers
Educational institutions and capital market players must design curricula and financial literacy initiatives that not only impart knowledge but also instill decision-making confidence
Paraphrasing the conclusions of researchers Safina Aulianisa and Sri Mulyati at the Islamic University of Indonesia, understanding psychological biases is essential for university students
Author Profiles
- Safina Aulianisa Corresponding Author. Researcher and undergraduate student in the Management Study Program, Faculty of Business and Economics, Islamic University of Indonesia (UII). Focuses on research and expertise in Financial Management and Behavioral Finance.
- Sri Mulyati Co-Author
. Lecturer and researcher within the Faculty of Business and Economics, Islamic University of Indonesia (UII), specializing in management and financial decision analysis .
Research Source
- Article Title: The Effect of Underconfidence Bias Perception on Investment Decisions of Management Students of the Islamic University of Indonesia
- Authors: Safina Aulianisa & Sri Mulyati
- Affiliation: Universitas Islam Indonesia (Islamic University of Indonesia)
- Publication Year: 2026
- Publication License: Open-access under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license
- DOI / Official URL: https://doi.org/10.55927/ijbae.v5i4.52
0 Komentar