Leadership Alone Doesn’t Boost Performance Without Job Satisfaction, Indonesian Study Finds

Illustration by AI

FORMOSA NEWS - Palembang - A 2026 study by Muhammad Fajerin, Sulaiman Helmi, M. Izman, and Sholahuddin from Bina Darma University in Palembang, Indonesia, reveals that leadership alone does not directly improve employee performance. Instead, job satisfaction plays a decisive mediating role. Published in the Asian Journal of Applied Business and Management, the research highlights why organizations—especially in the education sector—must focus on employee satisfaction to unlock performance gains.

The study examines employees at the River, Lake, and Crossing Transportation Polytechnic (Poltektrans SDP Palembang), a vocational institution under Indonesia’s Ministry of Transportation. The findings matter because employee performance directly affects service quality, institutional outcomes, and the development of skilled professionals in the transportation sector.

Why This Research Matters

Educational institutions are under increasing pressure to produce skilled graduates while maintaining high service standards. In organizations like Poltektrans SDP Palembang, employee performance is critical—not only for administrative efficiency but also for delivering effective education and training programs.

Poor employee performance can disrupt operations and weaken institutional reputation. On the other hand, strong performance supports smoother operations, better student outcomes, and improved public trust. This makes it essential to understand what truly drives employee performance.

Leadership and work discipline are often assumed to be key drivers. However, this study challenges that assumption by showing that the relationship is more complex, with job satisfaction acting as a crucial link.

How the Study Was Conducted

The researchers used a quantitative approach involving 74 employees at Poltektrans SDP Palembang. Data were collected through structured surveys that measured leadership, work discipline, job satisfaction, and employee performance.

To analyze the relationships between these variables, the team applied Structural Equation Modeling using the Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) method. This approach allowed them to examine both direct and indirect effects between variables in a comprehensive model.

Key Findings

The study presents several important findings that reshape how organizations should think about performance management:

1. Leadership does not directly improve employee performance.
Despite its importance, leadership alone showed no significant direct effect on performance.
2. Work discipline has a direct and positive impact on performance.
Employees with higher discipline levels tend to perform better.
3. Leadership significantly improves job satisfaction.
Effective leadership contributes to how satisfied employees feel in their roles.
4. Work discipline also increases job satisfaction.
Structured and disciplined work environments support employee satisfaction.
5. Job satisfaction strongly influences employee performance.
Satisfied employees are more productive and effective.
6. Job satisfaction fully mediates the effect of leadership on performance.
Leadership improves performance only when it enhances job satisfaction.
7. Job satisfaction partially mediates the effect of work discipline on performance.
Discipline affects performance both directly and indirectly through satisfaction.

These findings emphasize that job satisfaction is not just an outcome—it is a central mechanism that drives performance.

Real-World Implications

The results have significant implications for organizations, especially in education and public sector institutions:

1. Leadership strategies must prioritize employee satisfaction

Leaders should focus on communication, recognition, and career development to improve how employees feel about their work.

2. Discipline should be balanced with supportive work environments

While discipline improves performance, it must be implemented in a way that also supports employee well-being.

3. HR policies should integrate satisfaction as a performance driver

Organizations should measure and manage job satisfaction as a core performance indicator.

4. Training and development programs should go beyond technical skills

Programs that enhance motivation, engagement, and satisfaction can deliver stronger performance outcomes.

According to the authors from Bina Darma University, leadership becomes effective only when it creates a work environment that fosters satisfaction. In practical terms, this means leaders must go beyond directing tasks and focus on building positive employee experiences.

Expert Insight

Muhammad Fajerin and colleagues from Bina Darma University emphasize that job satisfaction is the key link between leadership and performance. Their findings suggest that even strong leadership will fail to improve outcomes if employees feel disengaged or dissatisfied.

This insight aligns with broader organizational research showing that emotional and psychological factors play a major role in productivity. Employees who feel valued and supported are more likely to contribute effectively to organizational goals.

Author Profile

Muhammad Fajerin is a researcher in management and organizational studies.

Sulaiman Helmi is a senior academic at Bina Darma University specializing in human resource management and organizational behavior.

M. Izman is a scholar focused on business and performance analysis.

Sholahuddin is an academic researcher in management and institutional development.

All authors are affiliated with Bina Darma University, Palembang, Indonesia, with expertise in human resource management, leadership, and organizational performance.

Source

Title: The Influence of Leadership and Work Discipline on Employee Performance at the River, Lake, and Crossing Transportation Polytechnic (Poltektrans SDP Palembang) Mediated by Job Satisfaction

Journal: Asian Journal of Applied Business and Management (AJABM)

Year: 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55927/ajabm.v5i2.33