In an era of increasingly complex global mobility, quick and precise administrative actions from immigration officials are often necessary to safeguard the nation's sovereignty and security. Research conducted by Nabilah Lensya and Rahmat Ramadhani from Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara in May 2026 analyzes the use of discretion by immigration officials in supervising foreign nationals in Indonesia.
Background and Issues
Situations often arise in the field where legal norms are incomplete, unclear, or unable to cover highly urgent conditions. Under these circumstances, immigration officials need to exercise discretionary authority (independent action/individual policy). However, the use of discretion risks causing abuse of authority if not managed within the proper legal framework. This study aims to examine the legal basis, implementation, and limitations of discretion in immigration governance.
Research Methodology
This research employs a normative juridical method using the statute approach and the conceptual approach. The researchers analyzed the legal basis and the limitations of the authority of immigration officials in making administrative decisions.
Key Findings
The research yields several important findings:
- The Importance of Discretion: Discretionary authority is indispensable for immigration officials to address regulatory gaps and deal with emergency conditions or unique situations in the field that cannot be resolved solely through rigid rules.
- Need for Operational Standards: The findings indicate that the primary weakness currently is the lack of clear Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and detailed technical guidelines. This creates legal uncertainty for immigration officers when taking actions.
- Legal Limitations: Discretion does not mean unlimited authority. Every administrative action must remain grounded in the General Principles of Good Governance (AAUPB) and must not contradict the primary objective of immigration law, which is to maintain national security.
Implications for Immigration Governance
The authors provide strategic recommendations for the government:
- Development of Technical Guidelines: More comprehensive technical guidelines are needed for immigration officials so that the discretion exercised is more measurable, objective, and legally accountable.
- Enhancement of Integrity and Oversight: A strict internal oversight mechanism is required to ensure that discretionary authority is not misused for personal gain or malpractice.
- Regulatory Reform: Adjusting immigration regulations to be more adaptive to the dynamics of global mobility so that the necessary room for discretion remains within clear legal corridors.
Author Profile:
- Nabilah Lensya, Rahmat Ramadhani – Researchers, Master of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.
Research Source: Lensya, N., & Ramadhani, R. (2026). "Discretionary Authority of Immigration Officials in the Supervision of Foreign Nationals in Indonesia: A State Administrative Law Perspective". Contemporary Journal of Applied Sciences (CJAS), 4(5), 529-540.
0 Komentar