Caring for Nationality in the Region: Religious Moderation as Socio-Religious Capital in Facing Religious Authorities, Artificial Intelligence, and Extremism in Enrekang

Illustration  by AI

Enrekang, South Sulawesi — Caring for Nationality in the Region: Religious Moderation as Socio-Religious Capital in Facing Religious Authorities, Artificial Intelligence, and Extremism in Enrekang. This research was conducted by Ushwa Dwi Masrurah Arifin Bando and Kartini from Makassar State University, and published in the International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research (IJSMR) Volume 4 Number 2 of 2026.

Research conducted by Ushwa Dwi Masrurah, Arifin Bando and Kartini revealed that religious moderation that lives in people's social practices can be a fortress against soft radicalization in the digital space.

Religious authority shifts to digital space

Based on in-depth interviews, limited observations, and analysis of digital documents, the research team found that the Enrekang community, especially the age group of 17-35 years, has a level of exposure to digital religious content in the medium to high category.

Short lectures on social media, video clips of da'wah, and instant answers from search engines and AI applications are the initial references in understanding daily religious issues. Religious authority is no longer determined only by the depth of knowledge and institutional recognition, but also by the number of followers, virality, and algorithm performance.

The researchers noted that social media algorithms act as accelerators through bubble filter and echo chamber mechanisms. Users tend to accept content that aligns with their initial preferences, thus narrowing the dialogue space and strengthening exclusive affiliations. However, this shift does not completely replace the role of local clerics. In Enrekang, traditional religious figures still have strong legitimacy, especially when they are adaptive to digital media and remain consistent in the value of moderation.

Extremism comes in the form of soft radicalization

Interestingly, this study did not find violence-based radicalism in Enrekang. The challenges that arise are more symbolic and cognitive, or what is referred to as soft radicalization.

The researchers mapped the spectrum as follows:

  1. Early exposure to exclusive content – High
  2. Normalization of intolerant narratives – Moderate
  3. Exclusive religious affiliation – Low–Medium
  4. Violent radicalism – Very low

The narrative that develops is usually in the form of claims of single truth, the delegitimization of local religious practices, and the dichotomy of "righteous groups" versus "deviant groups". Examples include online lectures that refer to local traditions as heretics, viral videos that reject cross-group dialogue, and chain messages that spark suspicion of formal institutions.

This radicalization takes place slowly and emotionally, not through direct calls for violence. However, in the long term, this pattern has the potential to weaken social cohesion if it is not balanced with the strengthening of the value of moderation.

Religious moderation as social capital

In the midst of this digital flow, the people of Enrekang have shown relatively strong social resilience. Values such as tawassuth (middle path), tasamuh (tolerance), ta'adul (justice), and deliberation are still alive in daily practice. Taklim councils, citizens' deliberations, and communication forums between religious leaders became a space for internalizing the value of moderation. Small conflicts are resolved through dialogue and persuasive approaches, not confrontations.

This study concludes that religious moderation functions as socio-religious capital, namely a network of values, norms, and beliefs that strengthen community cohesion and resilience. Ushwa Dwi Masrurah Arifin Bando emphasized that religious moderation is not only limited to policy programs, but also a lively and adaptive social practice. When these values are rooted in local culture, societies have internal mechanisms to filter out extreme narratives without a repressive approach.

AI as a mediator of religious knowledge

The study also highlights the role of AI as an epistemic mediator. AI is not just a technological tool, but it is also shaping the way society produces, consumes, and validates religious knowledge.

Some informants admitted that app-based answers or viral content are often received without a scientific verification process. This is where digital-religious literacy is important so that people are able to distinguish between scientific authority and algorithmic popularity.

Implications for policy and education

The study offers a clear message for governments and educational institutions: a security approach alone is not enough to confront latent digital extremism.

The researchers recommend several strategic steps:

1.      Strengthening digital-religious literacy for religious leaders and extension workers.

2.      Training on basic understanding of algorithms and AI so that local figures are able to produce moderate narratives in the digital space.

3.      The integration of religious moderation in the educational curriculum is dialogical and contextual.

4.      Strengthening the forum for religious harmony as a substantive dialogue space, including on online platforms.

Cultural and social-based approaches are considered more effective in building long-term resilience than repressive strategies.

Author profile

1.      Ushwa Dwi Masrurah Arifin Bando– Makassar State University.

2.      Kartini– Makassar State University.

Research source

Bando, U. D. M. A., & Kartini. (2026). Caring for the Nationality of the Region: Religious Moderation as Socio-Religious Capital in Facing Religious Authorities, AI and Extremism in Enrekang.

International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research (IJSMR), Vol. 4 No. 2, 2026.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsmr.v4i2.1

Official URL : https://journalijsmr.my.id/index.php/ijsmr


Posting Komentar

0 Komentar