Leadership Communication Strategy of Regional Leaders Through the Implementation of Protocols and Communication of the Government Leaders of South Tapanuli

Ilustrasi by AI 

Leadership Communication and Government Protocol Strengthen Public Trust in South Tapanuli, Study Finds

Effective leadership communication—supported by structured government protocols—plays a decisive role in building authority, credibility, and public acceptance of policies in regional governance. That is the central finding of a 2026 study conducted by Rika Amelia Pulungan and Icol Dianto of Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary. Published in the International Journal of Global Sustainable Research, the research highlights how strategic communication can improve governance outcomes in South Tapanuli, Indonesia.

The study matters because regional governments increasingly operate in an era of transparency, digital communication, and rising public expectations. Leaders are no longer judged solely on policy decisions but also on how clearly and ethically they communicate those decisions to the public.


Why Leadership Communication Matters Today

Across many regions, governments face growing pressure to maintain public trust while managing complex social and cultural dynamics. Communication failures can trigger misunderstandings, policy resistance, and declining legitimacy.

South Tapanuli presents a particularly relevant context. The region is characterized by strong kinship traditions, customary values, and respect for leadership figures. In such environments, communication strategies must go beyond bureaucratic messaging and reflect local culture.

The researchers argue that government protocol—often perceived as ceremonial—actually serves as symbolic communication that signals professionalism, order, and institutional authority. When paired with contextual messaging that resonates with community values, it becomes a powerful governance tool.


How the Study Was Conducted

Pulungan and Dianto used a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach based on library research. Rather than collecting field data, they reviewed:

  • Academic books on government and leadership communication
  • National and international scholarly journals
  • Official government documents and regulations
  • Publications related to public communication and local governance

The researchers applied systematic literature review methods and qualitative content analysis to identify patterns, theoretical insights, and best practices related to regional leadership communication.

To ensure reliability, multiple sources were compared through triangulation, allowing conclusions to reflect a synthesis of diverse academic perspectives.


Key Findings

Government Protocol Builds Leadership Authority

The study shows that protocol is more than a technical guideline for official events. It functions as symbolic communication that reinforces legitimacy and professionalism.

  • Organized ceremonies and formal procedures strengthen perceptions of competence.
  • Consistent protocol signals integrity and readiness to lead.
  • Poorly executed protocol can weaken authority and create impressions of disorganization.

Leadership authority, the authors note, is constructed not only through structural power but also through visible symbols displayed in official settings.


Communication Strategy Determines Policy Acceptance

Regional leaders act as primary communicators responsible for explaining policies to the public.

Important elements of effective communication include:

  • Clear and accessible language
  • Messages tailored to audience characteristics
  • Credibility demonstrated through consistent behavior
  • Alignment between words and actions

Policies delivered in overly technical language tend to confuse the public, while simplified messaging improves understanding without reducing substance.


Formal and Informal Channels Both Matter

The research emphasizes the importance of balancing structured communication with direct engagement.

Formal channels include speeches, press conferences, and coordination meetings. Informal channels—such as community dialogue, field visits, and meetings with local figures—help leaders build emotional connections and legitimacy.

Direct interaction allows leaders to hear public concerns and explain policies in relatable terms, significantly increasing community support.


Cultural Context Enhances Communication Effectiveness

Policies that ignore local values often face resistance. The study finds that incorporating cultural elements—such as local language or collaboration with traditional and religious leaders—bridges the gap between government and society.

In culturally rooted communities like South Tapanuli, persuasive and humanistic communication fosters a sense of shared ownership over public policies.


Digital Media Expands Reach—but Requires Discipline

Social media and digital platforms enable governments to deliver real-time information and encourage two-way communication. However, inconsistent messaging online can spread misinformation and erode trust.

The researchers stress that digital communication should remain aligned with government ethics and protocol standards.


Integration Is the Key to Effective Leadership

The most significant insight from the study is that combining formal protocol with contextual communication produces the strongest leadership outcomes.

Protocol provides structure and authority, while contextual messaging builds emotional closeness. Leaders who maintain this balance appear both professional and approachable.

As Pulungan and Dianto explain, the integration allows regional leaders “to appear structurally authoritative while simultaneously building emotional trust with the community.”


Real-World Impact

The study offers practical implications for government institutions, policymakers, and leadership training programs.

For regional governments:
Strengthening protocol capacity and communication skills can improve public perception and policy success.

For policymakers:
Communication strategy should be treated as a core governance function—not merely an administrative supplement.

For leadership development:
Training in public communication, cultural awareness, and digital messaging is essential for modern governance.

For communities:
Clear and dialogical communication promotes participation, transparency, and trust.

Ultimately, the research positions communication as a strategic investment in sustainable governance.


Author Insight

Pulungan and Dianto conclude that communication is not secondary to leadership—it is foundational. Regional leaders who combine structured protocol with adaptive communication are more likely to create responsive and trusted governments.

They emphasize that strengthening communication competence will help local administrations become more adaptive, participatory, and resilient in the face of social change.


Author Profiles

Rika Amelia Pulungan, M.A.
Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary
Field of expertise: Government communication and leadership studies.

Icol Dianto, M.Si.
Universitas Islam Negeri Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary
Field of expertise: Public communication and regional governance.


Source

Article Title: Leadership Communication Strategy of Regional Leaders Through the Implementation of Protocols and Communication of the Government Leaders of South Tapanuli
Journal: International Journal of Global Sustainable Research (IJGSR)
Year: 2026
DOI/URL: Not specified in the manuscript.

Posting Komentar

0 Komentar