Tangerang— Audit
Fees Emerge as Key Driver of Audit Quality in Indonesia’s Industrial and Basic
Materials Firms. The
research conducted by Adeline Yolanda Claudia Cristie and Kurniawati from Bunda
Mulia University, Tangerang, was published in January 2026 in the International
Journal of Business and Applied Economics (IJBAE).
The research conducted by Adeline
Yolanda Claudia Cristie and Kurniawati confirms that audit quality in basic
material and industrial companies in Indonesia is more influenced by the cost
of the audit than by the length of the auditor's relationship with the client
or the number of Key Audit Matters (KAM) disclosures. When audit quality is
low, the risk of material misstatement increases and market confidence can be
disrupted. Audit cases that have been questioned in recent years have also
driven the need to evaluate the factors that truly affect audit quality.
Since 2022, auditors in Indonesia have also been required to disclose Key Audit Matters—areas of the audit considered most significant and risky. In theory, KAM should make audit reports more transparent and informative. In practice, however, their real impact remains debated, especially when disclosures appear repetitive or generic across reporting periods.
Key Findings
Several results stand out:
1. Audit fees have a significant
positive effect.
Higher audit fees are strongly associated with higher audit quality. Adequate
compensation allows auditors to devote more time, staff, and procedures to the
engagement. This improves their ability to detect material misstatements and
exercise professional judgment more rigorously. The study reinforces the idea
that audit pricing reflects the depth and seriousness of the audit process.
2. Firm size shows a significant
negative effect.
Contrary to common assumptions, larger companies are not automatically linked
to better audit quality. Bigger firms often have more complex operations and
higher audit risk. If audit planning, resources, and procedures are not scaled
accordingly, audit quality can suffer. Company size alone does not guarantee
stronger audits.
3. Key Audit Matters have no
significant impact.
The number of KAM disclosures did not significantly improve audit quality. The
researchers note that KAM implementation in Indonesia still tends to be
“boilerplate,” with similar narratives repeated each year. As a result, KAM may
function more as a compliance requirement than as a meaningful
risk-communication tool.
4. Audit tenure is also not
significant.
The length of the auditor–client relationship did not significantly influence
audit quality. Professional standards, auditor rotation rules, and internal
quality controls may help maintain independence whether the engagement is short
or long term.
Implications for Business and Policy
For company management, the message is
clear: audit fees should not be treated merely as an administrative cost. They
are an investment in the credibility of financial reporting. Excessive
fee-cutting could reduce audit depth and increase reputational and financial
risks.
For regulators and standard setters,
the findings on KAM serve as a warning sign. The regulation exists, but
implementation quality needs improvement. Oversight should focus on ensuring
KAM disclosures are entity-specific, informative, and not simply recycled
language.
For audit firms, especially those
handling large and complex clients, careful audit planning and proper
allocation of time and staff are essential. Larger clients demand more tailored
procedures, not just larger engagement labels.
Kurniawati of Bunda Mulia University
emphasizes that audit pricing mechanisms signal how thoroughly an audit is
conducted, while disclosure tools like KAM still require refinement before they
can meaningfully enhance audit quality.
Researcher Profiles
- Adeline Yolanda Claudia Cristie-
Universitas Bunda Mulia
- Kurniawati-
Universitas Bunda Mulia
Research Source
Cristie,
A. Y. C., & Kurniawati. Determinant of Audit Quality: The Role of Key
Audit Matters, Audit Tenure, Audit Fees and Firm Size (Evidence From Basic
Materials and Industrial Companies 2022–2024).
International Journal
of Business and Applied Economics (IJBAE), Vol. 5 No. 1, 2026.
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijbae.v5i1.582
Official URL: https://nblformosapublisher.org/index.php/ijbae
.png)
0 Komentar