Financial Distress Increases the Risk of Financial Statement Fraud, While Governance and Technology Strengthen Prevention

Illustration by AI

Singaraja, Indonesia — Companies experiencing financial distress are significantly more likely to engage in financial statement fraud. However, strong corporate governance, effective external auditing, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices, and the adoption of machine learning technologies can substantially reduce that risk. These findings were presented in a study conducted by Gusti Ayu Komang Yanti Yulansari from Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, who systematically reviewed international research examining the relationship between financial distress and fraudulent financial reporting. The study offers a comprehensive overview of the factors that drive financial statement fraud and identifies strategies that can help organizations prevent it.

Financial statements serve as one of the primary sources of information for investors, creditors, regulators, and other stakeholders in assessing a company's financial health. Consequently, the credibility of financial reporting is essential for maintaining investor confidence and ensuring the stability of capital markets. Nevertheless, financial statement fraud continues to occur across various industries worldwide. In many cases, companies intentionally manipulate financial information to present a stronger financial position than actually exists, allowing them to maintain investor confidence, secure financing, and protect their corporate reputation.

The study explains that one of the major drivers of fraudulent financial reporting is financial distress, a condition in which a company experiences declining financial performance, reduced profitability, liquidity problems, increasing debt obligations, and the risk of bankruptcy. Under these circumstances, management often faces intense pressure to preserve the company's image and reassure investors, creating incentives to manipulate financial reports. This phenomenon aligns with Donald Cressey's Fraud Triangle Theory, which identifies pressure as one of the three fundamental elements that motivate individuals to commit fraud.

To provide a comprehensive understanding of this issue, the researcher employed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework. Scientific articles indexed in the Scopus database were systematically identified, screened, evaluated, and synthesized. The review process began with 98 articles, which were gradually narrowed through multiple screening stages until 10 high-quality studies met all selection criteria and were included in the final analysis. The PRISMA flow diagram presented on page five of the article illustrates each stage of the screening process and the final selection of studies.

The literature review consistently found a strong relationship between financial distress and financial statement fraud. As companies experience greater financial pressure, management becomes increasingly likely to engage in manipulative practices such as earnings management, tax avoidance, premature revenue recognition, and the presentation of financial statements that fail to reflect the company's true financial condition. Across the studies reviewed, higher levels of financial distress were consistently associated with a greater likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting.

The research also highlights that financial pressure alone does not determine whether fraud occurs. The quality of corporate governance plays a crucial role in reducing fraud risk. Companies with stronger governance structures, more diverse boards of directors, effective external auditing, and healthier liquidity conditions tend to have lower levels of fraudulent financial reporting. Strong governance functions as an internal control mechanism that limits opportunities for manipulation, even when organizations are under significant financial pressure.

Another important finding concerns the role of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices. Companies actively implementing ESG principles are less likely to experience financial distress and are generally more transparent in their financial reporting. Furthermore, lower levels of corruption, bribery, and unethical business practices strengthen the positive relationship between ESG performance and corporate financial stability. These findings suggest that sustainability initiatives contribute not only to environmental and social performance but also to stronger financial governance and fraud prevention.

Technological innovation also emerged as a significant factor in preventing financial fraud. Several studies included in the review demonstrate that machine learning has become an increasingly valuable tool for detecting financial distress and identifying irregularities in financial statements. By analyzing financial indicators such as revenue growth, profit margins, liquidity ratios, and unusual transaction patterns, machine learning systems can provide early warnings of potential fraud. These technologies enable auditors, regulators, and corporate managers to monitor financial reporting more efficiently and improve the early detection of fraudulent activities.

According to Gusti Ayu Komang Yanti Yulansari from Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, financial pressure significantly increases the likelihood of financial statement manipulation. Nevertheless, organizations can minimize this risk by strengthening corporate governance, improving audit quality, consistently implementing ESG principles, and integrating artificial intelligence-based technologies into their fraud detection systems. The researcher also recommends that future studies employ empirical company data to further examine the relationship between financial distress and financial statement fraud across different industries.

The findings provide valuable insights for businesses, investors, auditors, regulators, and policymakers. For companies, maintaining financial health must be accompanied by transparent governance and strong internal controls. Investors and auditors should recognize financial distress as an important early warning indicator of potential fraud. Meanwhile, regulators can strengthen market integrity by promoting technology-based monitoring systems capable of detecting financial reporting irregularities before they develop into larger financial scandals.

Author Profile

Gusti Ayu Komang Yanti Yulansari
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Singaraja, Indonesia.

Research Source

Article Title: Financial Distress and Financial Statement Fraud: Systematic Literature Review
Journal: East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR), Vol. 5, No. 7, 2026.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v5i7.221

Journal Link: https://journaleajmr.my.id/index.php/eajmr

Posting Komentar

0 Komentar