A 2025 study by Gerry Ananda Pasaribu and colleagues from State University of Jakarta reveals a growing paradox in digital bureaucracy, where rapid technological adoption fails to align with outdated regulations, slowing talent recognition. The findings are critical as they expose how digital transformation, without policy adaptation, can disrupt career progression and weaken institutional performance.
Across many public institutions, digital systems are introduced to improve efficiency. However, this study highlights a mismatch between advanced technology and rigid administrative rules, often referred to as a “regulatory lag.” As a result, organizations appear modern on the surface but still operate with slow, traditional processes .
The research focuses on a large-scale public institution facing a massive backlog in administrative processes, particularly in recognizing employee qualifications. Delays in this process not only affect operations but also reduce employee motivation and trust in the system.
Using a qualitative case study approach, the researchers examined how leaders respond to complex decision-making situations. Data were collected from various organizational levels, from top management to frontline staff, to understand how decisions are made during institutional crises.
Key findings from the study include:
- Digital transformation often outpaces regulatory frameworks, creating operational bottlenecks.
- Administrative backlogs can trigger “career stagnation” and reduce employee morale.
- Traditional decision-making processes are no longer effective in digital environments.
- A new model, Digital-Driven Strategic Decisiveness (DDSD), is proposed to align technology with policy.
- Strategic leadership plays a central role in resolving conflicts between digital systems and regulations.
The study shows that organizations must move beyond simply adopting technology. Instead, they need to redesign policies and decision-making processes to match digital capabilities. According to Gerry Ananda Pasaribu from State University of Jakarta, institutional resilience depends on leadership’s ability to integrate digital systems with formal regulations while maintaining fairness in talent recognition.
The implications are significant. For governments, the findings provide a roadmap to improve public service efficiency and reduce bureaucratic delays. For organizations, the study emphasizes the importance of aligning digital innovation with regulatory reform. For employees, faster and fairer recognition systems can strengthen motivation and career development.
The research also introduces the DDSD model as a strategic framework. This model highlights that effective decision-making in the digital era requires a balance between technological speed and legal authorization. It positions administrative agility not just as an operational need, but as a moral responsibility to protect human capital.
Author Profile
- Gerry Ananda Pasaribu - University of Jakarta
- Corry Yohana- University of Jakarta
- Christian Wiradendi Wolor- University of Jakarta
- Osly Usman- University of Jakarta
- Dewi Susita- University of Jakarta
- Cedaryana- University of Jakarta
Source
Pasaribu, G. A., Yohana, C., Wolor, C. W., Usman, O., Susita, D., & Cedaryana. (2025). The Global Paradox of Digital Bureaucracy: Strategic Decisiveness in Talent Recognition. International Journal of Educational Technology Research (IJETR), 4(1), 1–20.
0 Komentar