A comprehensive review of
environmental governance reveals that sustainable natural resource management
requires adaptive, polycentric, and equitable governance frameworks to bridge
the persistent gap between policy commitments and actual local benefits. The
study was conducted by Loso Judijanto of IPOSS Jakarta and published in 2026.
The research evaluates how ecological, economic, social, health, cultural, and
educational benefits are generated across complex social-ecological systems and
identifies the structural barriers that hinder fair benefit distribution. These
findings matter because human activities have already crossed six out of nine
planetary boundaries, increasing risks of environmental degradation, economic
instability, and climate disasters unless systemic governance reforms are
implemented.
Background and Context
Natural resources form the
foundational capital for human survival, climate resilience, and economic
development. However, conventional management approaches often treat natural
assets as mere production inputs, leading to overexploitation and severe environmental
damage. In developing nations such as Indonesia, governance
challenges—including overlapping land permits, tenure disputes, regional
capacity disparities, and short-term market pressures—frequently undermine
conservation commitments. As planetary boundaries are surpassed, effective
natural resource management must address societal and policy needs by
protecting ecosystem integrity while ensuring equitable distribution of
resources across community groups.
Methodology
The author employed a qualitative
literature review methodology with an integrative and interpretative approach.
The study analyzed peer-reviewed journal articles published since 2020 through
purposive-iterative searching, conceptual coding, cross-source comparison, and
thematic-narrative synthesis. The analysis evaluated interactions across five
distinct analytical layers: ecological conditions, values and benefits, actor
power relations, institutional instruments, and multidimensional outputs.
Key Findings
The study identifies five major
pathways through which sustainable management generates multidimensional
benefits, alongside critical barriers that disrupt execution:
- Ecological Protection and Resilience:
Integrated management of forests, peatlands, watersheds, and coastal
ecosystems preserves biodiversity, water cycles, soil fertility, and
carbon storage. This ecological diversity strengthens ecosystem resilience
against climate shocks such as droughts and floods.
- Economic Risk Reduction and Livelihood
Diversification: Healthy ecosystems serve as natural infrastructure
that reduces the costs of natural disasters. Sustainable practices like
agroforestry, ecotourism, and paludiculture diversify household income and
shield local economies from market volatility.
- Social, Cultural, and Educational Value:
Community-led conservation strengthens local governance organizations,
preserves Indigenous knowledge, and builds environmental literacy.
- Implementation Challenges: Governance
success is frequently blocked by institutional fragmentation between
government sectors, power imbalances favoring elites, tenure conflicts,
limited monitoring budgets, and economic incentives that favor short-term
exploitation over long-term conservation.
- Symbolic Participation Risks: Top-down
management policies often result in mere administrative compliance rather
than substantive ecological or social improvements.
Implications and Real-World
Impact
The study provides an actionable
framework for policymakers, industry leaders, civil society, and local
communities to transition from theoretical sustainability goals to practical
execution. To ensure fair distribution of environmental benefits, regulatory
frameworks must combine clear land tenure security, performance-based payment
systems, transparent licensing data, and independent conflict-resolution
mechanisms. Decentralized and polycentric governance—where authority is shared
among connected decision centers—enables local communities to actively manage
resources while receiving structural support from national authorities.
Integrating local and scientific knowledge strengthens policy legitimacy and
protects vulnerable groups during green economic transitions.
Academic Insight
Highlighting the core
institutional challenge in current natural resource management, Loso Judijanto
of IPOSS Jakarta notes:
"Environmental regulations
can lose their effectiveness when authority is fragmented, agency mandates
overlap, implementing resources are limited, data is unavailable, law
enforcement is weak, and economic interests hold disproportionate influence. Achieving
sustainability benefits depends on who has access, voice, knowledge, capacity,
and power in the management process."
Author Profile
- Loso Judijanto holds an academic background
in natural resource management and institutional governance. He is
affiliated with IPOSS Jakarta, Indonesia, specializing in adaptive
governance, environmental policy, and sustainable social-ecological
systems.
Source Information
- Article Title: Sustainable Natural Resource
and Environmental Management: A Review of Adaptive Governance, Benefit
Distribution, and Implementation Challenges
- Journal Name: International Journal of
Global Sustainable Research (IJGSR)
- Publication Year: 2026
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.59890/ijgsr.v4i7.293
- Official URL: https://slamultitechpublisher.my.id/index.php/ijgsr/index
0 Komentar